Hello Saku,
First of all, thank you very much for your continuous work on CQRLOG Alpha.
While investigating DXCC statistics, I noticed what may be an inconsistency in the New QSO window.
Observed behavior:
* The "DXCC info" panel correctly recognizes LoTW confirmations and displays entries such as:
"2024-02-21 17M LoTW cfmd".
* However, the bottom "DXCC statistic" table (tabDXCCStat) often shows only "X" instead of "L", "QL", or "QLE".
Example:
* Some QSOs imported from ADIF and later confirmed via LoTW are shown only as "X" in the bottom statistics.
* In contrast, QSOs having paper QSL received (QSL_R field) are frequently shown as "QL" or "QLE".
* Therefore, it appears that tabDXCCStat may prioritize paper QSL status over LoTW/eQSL confirmation status.
This can be confusing because "X" does not indicate whether the DXCC/band has already been confirmed via LoTW or only worked.
Suggestion:
Would it be possible for tabDXCCStat to reflect LoTW/eQSL confirmations consistently, similarly to the DXCC info panel?
Another small usability suggestion:
The "DXCC info" panel is not scrollable. When many confirmations exist, older entries are truncated and cannot be viewed. A vertical scrollbar (or displaying more lines) might be useful.
Thank you again for your excellent work on CQRLOG Alpha.
73,
HI Wakao San!
Thanks for information.
I have renamed my version to Cqrlog_Improved because the "Alpha" caused so much confusion. You'll find new repository from my github.
There has just been conversation about DXCC statistic in Cqrlog Telegram group.
It seems that there could be some kind of underlying bug with amount counting. It can reflect also to NewQSO statistic grid.
"X" should point ONLY worked, but NOT confirmed, country and should not be counted as CFM DXCC.
I will print out your message as reminder to check things you have pointed out.
What comes to "NewQSO/DXCC Info" it has been a long time since I have looked at it. If I remember right it shows only one confirmation for LoTW and eQSL.
They are the first ones fonund when seeking confirmations for a call.
I do not play with paper cards any more, so I can not say how they appear to Info view.
It might be that I am wrong about confirmation amount appearance, but I do not remember I had never seen overflow with texts inside the info view.
How ever auto-scrollbar can be considered.
--
Saku
OH1KH